
For those of you who may have had a minor heart attack when you heard that StarCraft II was being pushed back to 2010, you can rest easy.
A recent article in the Wall Street Journal, written by Sterne Agee analyst Arvind Bhatia, stated that they expect StarCraft II to be pushed back to 2010 because of the seemingly slow pace the developers are on.
IGN called Blizzard to get a response to the article and the following is what was said:
We're still targeting the end of the year for the launch of StarCraft II and we're also still targeting this summer for the start of the beta, so none of that's changed on this end. We're still looking to ship the game by the end of the year. If that changes, we'll let you guys know, but that's how things are looking right now.
While it is certainly feasible SC2 could get pushed back to 2010, we have to take Blizzard at its word right now and trust that so far they have a great track record and won't let their fans down. On that note, hit the jump to read the 6th fansite Q&A.

2) With missile barrage and Yamato cannon, Battlecruisers’ can deal with most threats. My question is, how effectively can a Battlecruiser be countered? How well do Hydralisks, Void Rays, and Vikings work vs Missile barrage? - camelmeat

